Legal Opinion

Bidar v. Amfac, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1983No. 8587PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*548OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The question for decision is whether the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit erred in awarding Amfac, Inc. (Amfac), a hotel owner and operator, summary judgment in an action brought by Alta Bidar (Mrs. Bidar or the plaintiff) to recover damages for injuries sustained in a fall that occurred while she was a guest at an Amfac hotel in Lahaina, Maui. Although we see no error in the grant of judgment in Amfac’s favor on Mrs. *549Bidar’s product liability claim, we conclude the presence of disputed factual issues precluded the summary disposition of her negligence…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. TakasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pickard v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Knodle v. Waikiki Gateway Hotel, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Maguire v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API