Legal Opinion

LITTLE BY LITTLE v. Bell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1998No. 92-CA-00645-SCTPublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

719 So.2d 757 (1998)

Andrea D. LITTLE, by mother and next friend, Regenia W. LITTLE

v.

Larry BELL and Karen Bell.

No. 92-CA-00645-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

August 6, 1998.

Attorney for Appellants, Charles R. Wilbanks, Sr.

Attorney for Appellees, Wendell H. Trapp, Jr.

En Banc.

SMITH, Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. Motion for rehearing is denied and these opinions are issued by the Court.

¶ 2. This case comes to this Court for the purpose of addressing whether the lower court's granting of a directed verdict on the grounds that Andrea Little was a licensee was correct. On November 19, 1990, Andrea…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Foradori v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Leffler v. SharpMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hudson v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Mallet v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Machado v. Yacht Haven U.S.V.I., LLCSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API