Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Sivils

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1956PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, a chiropractic physician, from a judgment of the circuit court which was entered in a malpractice action and which awarded the plaintiff damages totaling $10,000. The judgment is based upon the verdict of a jury.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff employed the defendant in July, 1951, “to treat him for a mild external and internal hemorrhoid condition. ’ ’ The complaint contains the following specifications of its charges of negligence:

“1. Giving a canstic and sclerosing injection for the treatment of hemorrhoids, the type and severity of plaintiff’s…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Sáez v. Municipio de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API