Legal Opinion

City of Norman v. Garza

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 2003No. 97,195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the Court of Civil Appeals was correct in declaring a lack of competent proof to support the panel’s order granting claimant temporary total disability benefits and psychological treatment. We answer this question in the affirmative.

¶2 On December 21, 2000, claimant filed his Form 3 wherein he sought psychiatric medical treatment for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome and depression, and Temporary Total Disability benefits during that treatment. Claimant alleged stomach injury and psychological overlay. At trial on March 29, 2001, the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Hammons v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NOMAC DRILLING LLC v. MowdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Heat Transfer & Equipment v. CauthonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Howard v. ACI DISTRIBUTION SOUTHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API