Legal Opinion
NOMAC DRILLING LLC v. Mowdy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 8, 2012No. 108,677PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLBERT, V.C.J.
T1 The issue presented on certiorari review is whether the claimant's expert medical testimony, relying in part on prior diagnosis by other medical professionals, satisfies the standards for expert medical testimony in a workers' compensation action. This Court answers in the affirmative.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
12 Kelly Mowdy (Claimant) is employed by Nomae Drilling, LLC (Employer) as a floor hand. Claimant is a resident of Lindsay, Oklahoma, but his duty station was at a Louisiana well site. Claimant's regular work shift was "seven days on and seven days off," and he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Hammons v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Dunlap v. THE MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Townley's Dairy v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Prince v. Brake Rebuilders & Friction Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- Westoak Industries, Inc. v. DeLeonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.