Legal Opinion

Heat Transfer & Equipment v. Cauthon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 26, 2004No. 99,446PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

I.ISSUE

¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented for our review is whether there is any competent evidence to support the Workers’ Compensations Court’s findings of fact. The petitioner asserts as a second issue whether the “last injurious exposure” rule of title 85, subsection 11(B)(4) of the Oklahoma Statute requires an employee claiming benefits for injury from an occupational disease to establish that the employee was not merely exposed to potentially causal conditions but that those conditions caused injury during the time of exposure.

II.FACTS

¶ 2 The claimant, Gary Cauthon, worked as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitener v. South Central Solid Waste AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Parks v. Flint Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Yeatman v. Northern Oklahoma Resource Center of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. City of Norman v. GarzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Hall v. JestesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. ZINC CORP. OF AMERICA v. ReederCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Neel v. American Woodmark Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Southern Material Handling Co. v. FallingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API