Legal Opinion

Myers v. Brockamp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 17, 2015No. C092084CV; A151966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying her petition for post-conviction relief. She first assigns error to the court’s denial of her claim alleging that the criminal trial court judge coerced her into waiving her right to a jury trial, and additionally argues that the judgment fails to comply with ORS 138.640(1), as construed in Datt v. Hill, 347 Or 672, 676, 227 P3d 714 (2010). We reverse and remand based on the deficiencies in the judgment, and do not reach petitioner’s first assignment given those deficiencies.

We begin with the judgment. ORS 138.640(1) requires that a judgment granting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Fisher v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Myers v. HowtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Walls v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Alisha Dawn Myers v. Paula Myers, SuperintendentDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API