Legal Opinion

State v. Bucholz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1992No. 10-89-10075; CA A66293PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*626De MUNIZ, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence found during a warrantless search of a backpack. We reverse and remand.

In reviewing the lawfulness of a warrantless search, we are bound by the trial court’s findings of historical facts, if they are supported by the evidence. State v. Stevens, 311 Or 119, 126, 806 P2d 92 (1991). While on patrol, Officer Barrong saw a car that was emitting visible exhaust. The driver did not signal before turning into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. DowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API