Legal Opinion

State v. Tourtillot

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1980No. 10158, CA 10998, SC 26660PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

The decision in this case turns on the applicability of ORS 131.615 and the requirements of the state and federal constitutions. Three issues are presented for our determination:

1. Do police game checkpoint stops violate ORS 131.615 when there is neither probable cause to believe nor reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed?

2. Are game checkpoint stops violative of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution or the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when there is neither probable cause to believe nor reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed?

3…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Seattle v. MesianiWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API