Sack v. Sack
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Trent Sack appeals from that portion of a district court judgment and divorce decree awarding Theresa Sack rehabilitative spousal support for six years. He argues Theresa is not a “disadvantaged spouse” and is not entitled to support. Theresa cross-appeals from that portion awarding Trent certain personal property in the court’s property division. We affirm the district court’s judgment.
I
[¶ 2] Theresa Sack brought this divorce action in 2003. Trent and Theresa were married in 1998 and had lived together since 1993. Three children were born of the marriage.
[¶3] When the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Francis v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Wiege v. WiegeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Ulsaker v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Lorenz v. LorenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.