Legal Opinion

Sack v. Sack

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2006No. 20050167PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Trent Sack appeals from that portion of a district court judgment and divorce decree awarding Theresa Sack rehabilitative spousal support for six years. He argues Theresa is not a “disadvantaged spouse” and is not entitled to support. Theresa cross-appeals from that portion awarding Trent certain personal property in the court’s property division. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Theresa Sack brought this divorce action in 2003. Trent and Theresa were married in 1998 and had lived together since 1993. Three children were born of the marriage.

[¶3] When the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Francis v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wiege v. WiegeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ulsaker v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lorenz v. LorenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API