Matthews v. Lopus
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action for the recovery of money placed on a wager by the plaintiff and one William Matthews in the custody of the defendant as a stakeholder.
The complaint, in substance, alleges that, on the fifteenth day of September, 1912, at the town of Penngrove, in Sonoma County, the plaintiff and said William Matthews deposited with the defendant as wagers the sums of five hundred dollars and one hundred dollars, respectively, said sums, .with other moneys wagered against them, to be held by the defendant as a stakeholder with the mutual understanding between the parties and instructions to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Parker v. OtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Los Angeles v. City BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnston v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- McGregor v. DonellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Doty v. LaceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Randall v. BeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Deorosan v. Haslett Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- National Stone Tile Corp. v. VoorheisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.