Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. v. Bnsf Railway Company

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-0559Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II) MDL Docket No. 2925 Misc. No. 20-00008 (BAH) This document relates to: No. 1:19-cv-03379 (BAH) No. 1:19-cv-03516 (BAH) No. 1:19-cv-03517 (BAH) No. 1:19-cv-03618 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00023 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00328 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00447 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00523 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00559 (BAH) No. 1:20-cv-00790 (BAH) MEMORANDUM OPINION Over 300 rail freight shippers, who are the plaintiffs in this multidistrict litigation, In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API