Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, J.:
The numerous issues now presented are to a large extent .the issues presented upon the former review. The main reason assigned for such repetition is the renewed contention of petitioner, not expressly passed upon in our former opinion, that it is entitled to raise the question of confiscation of its property under the rate fixed by the Commission; that upon the determination of that question in a certiorari proceeding it is entitled to the independent judgment of the court upon the facts as well as the law; and that if this court does not possess the power in this proceeding to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1925
- New Rochelle Water Co. v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- New York Ex Rel. Consolidated Water Co. v. MaltbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Staten Island Edison Corp. v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- County Transportation Co. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.