Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of Kentucky

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1925No. 5:07-misc-00006PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickenlooper, District Judge

(for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation in the Eastern District of Kentucky). This is an action brought by the United Fuel Gas Company and the War-field Natural Gas Company, both corporations, created, respectively, under the laws of West Virginia and Kentucky, to enjoin an order of the Railroad Commission of Kentucky fixing the rates at which natural gas shall be sold in the municipalities of Ashland, Catlettsburg, and Louisa, all in Kentucky. Before discussing the several points raised by counsel, it might be of interest and assistance to observe the relationship of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1932
  2. Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1934
  3. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. v. City of Texarkana, Ark.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1936
  4. Superior Oil Corp. v. MatlockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Yarbrough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API