Legal Opinion

New York Ex Rel. Consolidated Water Co. v. Maltbie

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 14, 1938No. 380PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In a proceeding before the Public Service Commission of the State of New York relating to rates for water supplied by appellant to the City of Utica and adjacent communities, the Commission, on June 28, 1933, after full hearing and upon findings determining the fair value of the property of appellant used and useful in rendering service to its customers, the amount of annual operating income required to yield a six per cent, return upon such fair value, and the average operating income of the company for the years 1930 and 1931 (as adjusted to allow for additional expense), directed appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. People Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. People Ex Rel. Consolidated Water Co. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lakeland Water District v. Onondaga County Water AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Lowell Gas Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Staten Island Edison Corp. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. New York Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API