Legal Opinion

County Transportation Co. v. Maltbie

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The right of a public utility to sue -the Public Service Commission in equity for an injunction against the enforcement of a rate claimed to be confiscatory is now admissible under the New York practice (Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Maltbie, 296 N. Y. 374). The earlier doubts about the practice which seemed to leave open an article 78 proceeding in the nature- of certiorari as the only relief from confiscation under constitutional protection have now been resolved in favor of equity as an additional remedy.

There were earlier views which upheld parallel equitable relief. See discussions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Staten Island Edison Corp. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. New Rochelle Water Co. v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Staten Island Edison Corporation v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Staten Island Edison Corp. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API