Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Beno

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1985No. 71558, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

This case requires interpretation of the "practice of chiropractic” under the licensing provision of the Public Health Code as it relates to the use of x-ray in other than the spinal area, the giving of a general physical examination including the analysis of hair and urine samples, the execution of an employee health record, the use of galvanic current, ultrasound, and diathermy, and the dispensing of vitamins to patients.

We hold that the dispensing of vitamins is within the practice of chiropractic, that the record is not sufficiently developed to decide the applicability of the statute as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kentucky Ass'n of Chiropractors v. Jefferson County Medical SocietyKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Attorney General v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Stockwell v. Washington State Chiropractic Disciplinary BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Cotter v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sheila L. Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation Kellermeyer Building Services, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. MacDonald v. BarbarottoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Foster v. Georgia Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Wengel v. HerfertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API