Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 23, 1974No. 1159-2PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

— This appeal concerns the scope of practice of chiropractors and drugless healers in this state. The defendant, James A. Wilson, was enjoined by the trial court from using needles or other means to penetrate human tissues, from practicing acupuncture, and from prescribing or administering any drugs.

On appeal the defendant objects to the specific application of the injunction, arguing that he should be allowed to take blood samples for diagnostic purposes, practice galvanic acupuncture (a form of electrotherapy), prescribe or give vitamins, minerals, and food supplements to his patients.

We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ellestad v. SwayzeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. KelseyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. LydonWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Attorney General v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Attorney General v. BenoMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brannan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. RoosIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API