Legal Opinion

Application of Nathan R. Cline

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 1, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7417PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Nathan R. Cline appeals from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, wherein the examiner’s rejection of claims 10 and 11 of appellant’s patent application was sustained. No claims were allowed.

Appellant’s application, serial No. 768,314, filed October 20,1958, is entitled “Fountain Pen.” The claims are very descriptive of the invention; claim 10, the more detailed of the two, reads as follows:

“10. A fountain pen for instant drying writing inks comprising, in combination, an elongated pen barrel open at one end and closed at the other end,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Bernhard W. A. Weber and Hugh D. McLeeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of George W. Luvisi and Thomas C. NohejlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Paul S. MenoughCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of Joseph G. Wilson, Robert F. Dutton, Terrell W. Haymes and Justin C. DygertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of Kemper M. HammellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. E-T Industries, Inc. v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  3. Application of John T. RauenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Converse v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  5. E-T Industries, Inc. v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API