Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of George W. Luvisi and Thomas C. Nohejl

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 11, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7228PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25 and 28 through 36 in application serial No. 789,479, filed January 28,1959, entitled “Herbieidal Compositions and Method for the Manufacture Thereof.” No claim has been allowed.

The invention relates to (1) a process for killing undesired vegetation, (2) a composition employed for this purpose, and (3) a process for preparing the latter. The composition contains two essential ingredients, viz., a phytotoxic 1-alkyl-3-phenyl substituted urea and a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of John P. LambooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, and Luther H. Hodges, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Application of Paul E. HochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Application of Kenneth L. RussellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. Application of Nathan R. ClineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API