Legal Opinion
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Brenner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 373-65PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT
JACKSON, District Judge.
1. Plaintiff, as assignee of Carlo Concilio, Piero Lanza and Mario Preti, brought this action under 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking a judgment from this Court authorizing the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to issue a patent to plaintiff containing Claims 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Concilio et al. application Serial No. 101,656, filed April 10, 1961, entitled “Threo-3(p-methylsulfonylphenyl) - 2 - dichloroacetamido-l-(aminoacetoxy)- 3 -propanol and Preparation Thereof.”
2. The application in suit relates to an ester (identified in the title of the application) and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Rene De Montmollin and Henri RiatCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of FinleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Application of Nathan R. ClineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pacific Technica Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Converse v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- O'Keefe v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966