Legal Opinion
Converse v. Brenner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 9, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 1300-65PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, District Judge.
This is a civil action under 35 U.S.C. § 145 in which plaintiffs seek a judgment from this Court, authorizing the Commissioner of Patents to grant them a patent containing Claims 16 through 20-*228of their application Serial No. 112,493 filed June 5, 1961 and entitled METHOD OF LAMINATING POLYURETHANE FOAM AND FABRIC.
Claim 17 is the broadest and reads as follows:
17. A method of adhesively securing a web of porous fabric to provide a laminate having breathing and insulating properties and being resistant to washing and dry cleaning solutions making the same suitable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sharp v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Application of Nathan R. ClineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- In re HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Keefe v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966