Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1988No. 10560PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Claimant-worker, Strickland, appeals a final dispositional order of the workers’ compensation division denying him compensation and related benefits. The calendar notice proposed summary affirmance and Strickland filed a timely memorandum opposing summary affirmance. We affirm.
Strickland’s first issue is whether certain interim provisions of the workers’ compensation law enacted in 1986 apply to the present case. See 1986 N.M.Laws, ch. 22, §§ 4 & 5 (codified as NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-24 & -25 (Cum.Supp.1986)). Strickland was injured on May 15, 1986, although he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Wittkowski Ex Rel. Wittkowski v. State, Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Security Trust v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Noffsker v. K. Barnett & SonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Herman v. Miners' HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Barela v. Midcon of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Baca v. Complete Drywall Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.