Legal Opinion
Barela v. Midcon of New Mexico, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1989No. 10828PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
On the motion of respondents for rehearing, the prior opinion of the court is withdrawn and the following is substituted.
Respondents Midcon of New Mexico, Inc. (Midcon), and Safeco Insurance Company appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Division (WCD) hearing officer finding that claimant was disabled as a result of a work-related accident and awarded compensation and related benefits. They challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to establish (a) causal connection between any disability and a work-related accident; (b) permanent total disability; and (c)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Baca v. Bueno FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Quintana v. Trotz Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Strickland v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- DiMatteo v. County of Dona Ana Ex Rel. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & HeatingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Dingus v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Coslett v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bierner v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gonzales v. Lovington Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.