Legal Opinion
Noffsker v. K. Barnett & Sons
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1963No. 7262PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
In this case, claimant sought compensation, together with certain medical and surgical expenses, and appeals only because of the limited amount of medical benefits allowed by the trial court.
The claim seeking compensation was filed in April of 1962, for an injury suffered in 1958. The trial court ruled, and properly so on the facts as found, that the claim for compensation was barred, but allowed claimant $700.00 for medical and surgical expenses and attorney’s fees.
Between the time of the accident and the time when a spinal fusion was performed on claimant, the New Mexico…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- George v. Miller & Smith, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Yaeger v. Delano Granite WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Nasci v. Frank Paxton Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Salmon v. Denhart ElevatorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Dudley v. Ferguson Trucking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Herman v. Miners' HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Nieves v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Cooper v. Wicomico CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Strickland v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.