Legal Opinion

Hendershott v. Young

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1956No. [No. 130, October Term, 1955.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

We granted petitioner’s application for leave to appeal from the denial of habeas corpus. She is a practicing lawyer in Montgomery County and had formed the conclusion that Chapters 151 and 174 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1955, which together repealed and re-enacted Sec. 92A of Art. 52, Code, 1951, had abolished the office of justices of the peace, and justices of the peace designated as committing magistrates, for Montgomery County and transferred all of their former authority, power and jurisdiction to the judges of the newly created People’s Court for Montgomery County. Chapters…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baker v. GriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Johnson v. HoySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ex Parte Henry WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Bales v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sabisch v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Díaz Díaz v. Cándida Campos de CórdovaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  4. McGloin v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. In Re FincherOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API