Legal Opinion
Baker v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 17, 2003No. 109, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether, pursuant to a collateral attack, we should vacate as illegal, the sentence of a judge, who was appointed pursuant to the Maryland Constitution and duly elected to the Circuit Court for Harford County, but who may have lived outside of Harford County for a period of time during his term, in contravention to the residency requirements for state judges enumerated in the Maryland Constitution. The Circuit Court for Harford County denied the petitioner’s motions attacking the of the Circuit Court judge in this case. We shall affirm.
I
Neither the facts underlying…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Baker v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. IrbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Estate of Garner v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.