In Re Fincher
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, P. J.
This is an original action in habeas corpus, filed by George Fincher, who says that “he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty, in that he is imprisoned by Harry Whiddon, chief of police of the city of Akron, at the Akron city jail, Akron, Ohio.”
The facts disclose that Fincher was arrested on a warrant in a criminal case issued out of the Municipal Court of Akron. The arrest took place in the corridor outside of one of the courtrooms of that court, prior to the opening of the session of court for the day upon which the arrest was made.
He was taken by the arresting officer to be booked and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stallings v. SplainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- In Re PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Lane, Smith & Barg v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Hendershott v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Bogar v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Petrowski v. State, Unpublished Decision (6-30-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999