Legal Opinion
Sabisch v. Moyer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 20, 2019No. 6/19PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joshua Sabisch v. Stephen T. Moyer et al. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, No. 6, September Term, 2019 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS – MD. CODE ANN., CTS. & JUD. PROC. (1974, 2013 REPL. VOL., 2015 SUPP.) (“CJ”) § 3-702(a) – “COMMITTED, DETAINED, CONFINED, OR RESTRAINED FROM [] LAWFUL LIBERTY WITHIN [] STATE” – PROBATION – Court of Appeals held that, under plain language of CJ § 3-702(a), to be eligible to petition for writ of habeas corpus, person must be “committed, detained, confined, or restrained from his [or her] lawful liberty within [] State[,]” nothing more…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- State v. KrikstanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Thornton Mellon v. A. Dennis Exempt TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- E.N. v. T.R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.