Legal Opinion

Currid v. Meeting House Restaurant, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 Gilfred L. Spradlin appeals, pro se, from the April 15, 2004, $25,875.92 judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Currid following a nonjury trial, the underlying lawsuit arising out of a 1999 agreement to purchase a liquor license. The award to appellee included $16,000 for “business consulting services,” $5,434.52 interest, and $4,286.90 attorneys’ fees.

¶ 2 Resolution of this appeal requires a detailed explanation of the three related cases resolved in the trial court. This procedural morass began July 31, 1999, when the parties entered into an agreement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walacavage v. Excell 2000, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Raw v. LehnertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Abbott v. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. West Conshohocken Restaurant Associates, Inc. v. FlaniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Quinn v. BuppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Nevyas v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Pocono Summit Realty, LLC v. Ahmad Amer, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. McGaffic v. City of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Front Street Development Associates, L.P. v. Conestoga BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API