Legal Opinion

36 DeForest Avenue, LLC v. Creadore

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 27, 2007No. AC 26573PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

The plaintiff, 36 DeForest Avenue, LLC, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its application to discharge or reduce a mechanic’s lien placed on its property by the defendant, Leonard Creadore. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the court improperly concluded that there was probable cause to sustain the validity of the lien because it was not (1) timely filed or (2) properly served on the prior owner of the property as required by General Statutes § 49-34. The plaintiff claims further that Connecticut’s mechanic’s lien statutes axe unconstitutional. We affirm…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Conservation Society of Southern Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Roundhouse Construction Corp. v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rutka v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Lucien v. McCormick Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Baillergeau v. McMillanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Cianci v. ORIGINALWERKS, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Waterview Site Service, Inc. v. Pay Day, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API