Rutka v. City of Meriden
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff, John Rutka, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, the city of Meriden, on his application to discharge four “mechanic’s lien[s]” placed on his real property by the city. One of the hens was described by the court as an anti-blight lien and the other three liens were described as property maintenance hens. The court rendered judgment for the defendant as to two of the property maintenance hens, for the plaintiff as to the third property maintenance hen,1 and dismissed the plaintiffs apphcation to discharge the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Stepney Pond Estates, Ltd. v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SaturnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PollardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Villages, LLC v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. GallantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Customers Bank v. BoxerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.