Osborn & Caywood Ditch Co. v. Green
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
This is an appeal from an injunction issued by the trial court which prohibited the defendants Green from irrigating across the plaintiff’s canal. We modify the injunction, and, as modified affirm.
The trial court found the facts to be as follows. Plaintiff is Osborn-Caywood Ditch Company (company) which owns the Osborn-Caywood Ditch. This ditch, which has been in existence for many years, bisects the Greens’ land. In 1977, the defendant Jerald Green contacted the owners of the ditch company and indicated that he desired to install a moveable overhead sprinkler to irrigate his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnard v. GaumerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- North Union Canal Company v. NewellUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Shrull v. RapasardiColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Neville v. Louden Irrigating Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Bijou Irrigation District v. Empire ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.