Legal Opinion

North Union Canal Company v. Newell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1976No. 14238PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff, North Union Canal Company, brought this suit to compel defendants Newell to remove a fence which they had placed along the bank of plaintiff’s canal *179which flows through the defendants’ property. From a judgment in defendants’ favor plaintiff appeals, contending that the fence will interfere with its long established easement for the use and maintenance of its canal.

The North Union Canal was constructed and has been in continuous operation during the irrigation seasons for more than 75 years. It is a substantial canal several feet in width which carries water from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Holm v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stevens v. Bird-Jex Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McBride v. McBrideUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Carrier v. LindquistUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Flying Diamond Corp. v. RustUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Nyman v. Anchor Development, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wykoff v. BartonUtah Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API