Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Gaumer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 8, 1961No. 19164PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

This writ of error is concerned with two civil actions in the trial court, that in which defendant in error W. B. Gaumer was plaintiff, and plaintiff in error R. A. Barnard and others were defendants; the other in which defendant in error Burton S. Morwood was plaintiff, and plaintiffs in error were the defendants.

The two actions were consolidated for trial and are presented here for review as one action. The only parties appearing here are plaintiffs in error R. A. Barnard and Lulu E. Barnard; and the City and County of Denver, one of the defendants in error.

The objects of the first action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bina v. BinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. City of Denver v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Dereus v. PeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  4. Lamb v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Van Natta v. Nys & EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gerrity Oil & Gas Corp. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. High Lonesome Ranch v. Board of County CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API