Legal Opinion

Hall v. Galey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1928No. 28,167PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages for ruining a well which furnished the principal supply of water for their farm.

It appears that for some years past plaintiffs have owned a farm of 280 acres in Wilson county. The farm is well improved with farm buildings conveniently located near the well. The usual activities of agriculture, dairying, gardening and poultry raising have hitherto been successfully conducted on the farm. Until its destruction this well contained a never-failing supply of good water, suitable and used for plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Board of Commissioners v. LaboreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. LycanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. C. B. U. P. Rld. Co. v. TwineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. Kansas City, Olathe, Lawrence & Topeka Railway Co. v. WeidenmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Bean v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  3. Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Berry v. Shell Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Sheridan Oil Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API