Legal Opinion

Williams v. Amoco Production Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 27, 1987No. 59,277, 59,278PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an action for damages to real property resulting from the presence of natural gas in plaintiffs’ irrigation water. The plaintiff landowners (hereafter plaintiffs or appellees) claim the natural gas escaped from two of the. defendant’s Hugoton gas wells. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for $656,006.40, and the defendant, Amoco Production Company, appeals.

Irrigation water in southwest Kansas is derived primarily from water-bearing aquifers known as: (1) The Pleistocene deposits, located at a depth of approximately…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Roe v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Johnson v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Pullen v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Falls v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  5. Miller v. Cudahy Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API