Legal Opinion
Vollrath v. DePuy Synthes Business Entities
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 3, 2022No. 3:19-cv-01577Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JURGEN VOLLRATH, Case No. 3:19-cv-1577-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. DePUY SYNTHES BUSINESS ENTITIES, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, DOES I through X, and ROE Business Entities I through X, Defendants. Jurgen Vollrath, Plaintiff, pro se. Anne M. Talcott, SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT PC, 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97204; David L. Ferrera, NUTTER MCCLENNEN & FISH LLP, 155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston, MA 02210; David R. Schmahmann, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SCHMAHMANN, 1577 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA 02446. Of Attorneys for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.