Legal Opinion
HACKER v. 3M COMPANY
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided January 25, 2021No. 7:20-cv-00131Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, Case No. 3:19-md-2885 Judge M. Casey Rodgers Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones This Document Relates to: Stephen Hacker Case No. 7:20-cv-131 ______________________________/ AMENDED ORDER1 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Testimony from [Plaintiff’s] Experts Relating to Conditions that [Plaintiff] Claims Other than Hearing Loss and Tinnitus. ECF No. 36. Plaintiff Stephen Hacker has filed a response in opposition, ECF No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pablo Guevara v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Ernestine Mitchell v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Santiago-Díaz v. Laboratorio Clínico Y De Referencia Del EsteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Bearint Ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Lynda Sue Hancock v. Richard M. Hobbs, City of MariettaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.