Legal Opinion
Cosmotek Mumessillik Ve Ticaret Ltd. Sirkketi v. Cosmotek USA, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 2, 1996No. Civ. 3:95CV1390(PCD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO STAY
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Defendants move to stay this proceeding pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) 9 U.S.C. § 3. Defendants claim that their contract requires the parties to arbitrate. Plaintiff opposes, asserting that Advanced Power Systems International, Inc. (APSI) cannot be compelled to arbitrate because it was not a party to the contract.
I. BACKGROUND
Cosmotek USA (USA), and Cosmotek Mu-messillik ve Tiearet Limited Sirkketi (Turkey), entered into an agreement (contract) whereby Turkey became USA’s distributor and sales representative for the sale of Fitch…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knepp v. Credit Acceptance Corp. (In Re Roy A.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
- Rossi Fine Jewelers, Inc. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Pike Co. v. Tri-Krete Ltd.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Trustmark Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- De Moura Castro v. Loanpal, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.