Legal Opinion

Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Trustmark Ins. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 9, 2003No. CIV.3:01 CV 2198(PCD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION

DORSEY, District Judge.

Third party defendant TIG Insurance Co. (“TIG”) moves to stay the present proceedings in deference to its arbitration proceedings with plaintiff.

I. BACKGROUND

TIG and plaintiff entered into a Reinsurance Agreement, effective January 1,1999, which contains an arbitration clause providing that:

As a condition to any right of action hereunder, any irreconcilable dispute between the parties to this Agreement shall be submitted to a board of arbitration composed of two arbitrators and an umpire meeting at a place to be agreed by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Nederlandse Erts-Tankersmaatschappij, N v. V. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc. And Jacob IsbrandtsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Sierra Rutile Ltd. v. KatzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Chang v. LinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Water Rights of USSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. United States v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API