Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Tobriner
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1984No. Civ. 53134PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in a condemnation action. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Con cord (the Agency) moved under Code of Civil Procedure section 657 for a new trial on the issue of just compensation. The trial court granted the motion on the ground that it had erred in denying the Agency’s motions to strike the valuation evidence proffered by the condemnees.
The owners of the interests condemned (hereafter appellants) also attack as erroneous the trial court’s holding that the taking was proper; its granting of nonsuit on their…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marshall v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Village of Round Lake v. AmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- County Sanitation District No. 8 v. Watson Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- City of Steamboat Springs v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Redevelopment Agency v. TobrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.