Legal Opinion
County Sanitation District No. 8 v. Watson Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1993No. B070099PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, Acting P. J.
Defendant and appellant Watson Land Company (Watson) appeals from a judgment in this eminent domain action brought by plaintiff and respondent Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 8 (the District). Watson contends that the trial court erred in granting the District’s motions in limine excluding testimony of Watson’s expert regarding the value of the easements condemned by the District and in denying Watson’s request for a continuance to obtain admissible expert testimony on valuation. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural Background
The District is a public entity…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. HuffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Contra Costa Water District v. Bar-C PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Heiner v. Kmart Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- CONTRA COSTA WATER DIST. v. Vaquero Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.