Kassap v. Seitz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
The question we are called upon to decide in the case before us is the proper allocation of the burden(s) of proof in a civil suit brought under the Electronic Surveillance Act; Maryland Code (1984 Repl.Vol., 1988 Cum.Supp.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, §§ 10-401 — 10-414 1 (the Act). In particular, we are presented with the question of which party carries the burden of persuading the trier of fact in regard to whether the interceptor was or was not acting under the direction and supervision of a Maryland investigative or law enforcement officer and was or was not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Patrick W. McCann III and Jon Joseph KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Deibler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Board of Trustees, Community College of Baltimore County v. Patient First Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Samuel v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.