Legal Opinion
Kalur v. Resor
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 21, 1971No. Civ. A. 1331-71PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sections 2201, 2202. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. Section 1331, and 5 U.S.C. Sections 702, 706. Plaintiffs Jerome S. Kalur and Donald Large are consistent users of the Grand River in Northeastern Ohio. They use the river for numerous eonservational and recreational activities. This suit is brought by them on behalf of all persons and conservation groups that are similarly situated. Defendants Resor,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, No. 76-1674Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.