Legal Opinion
Banco Del Estado v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 25, 1996No. 95C-5889PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.
Defendants, Navistar International Transportation Corporation and Navistar International Export Corporation (collectively “Nav-istar”), have moved this court to dismiss the Complaint of the plaintiff, Banco del Estado (the “Bank”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), this court must presume that all of the facts alleged in the Complaint are true, and must examine them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Ellsworth v. City of Racine, 774 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir.1985),…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Title Insurance Company v. Lacelaw CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Village of South BarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Cobb-Alvarez v. Union Pacific Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Banco Del Estado v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Batteast Construction Co. v. Public Building Commission of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Banco Lavra, S.A. v. Cargil InternationalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.