Legal Opinion

State v. Kupau

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1994No. 15885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WATANABE, J.

In this appeal, Defendant-Appellant Walter Kupau, Jr. (Defendant) contends that his jury conviction of Assault in the Second Degree should be reversed for two reasons: first, the trial court committed plain error when it failed, sua sponte, to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense (LIO) of Assault in the Third Degree; and second, the conduct of Defendant’s trial counsel deprived Defendant of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.

We agree that the trial court plainly erred when it failed sua sponte to give the LIO instruction.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Wesley Walker, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Hector Luis Lopez Andino, United States of America v. Israel Mendez SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Daniel P. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KupauHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CorpuzHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. ItoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. KAPAUHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. Adviento.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API