Legal Opinion

State v. Ito

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1997No. 18903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

We hold in this appeal by Defendant-Appellant Garret K Ito (Defendant) from his March 24, 1995 judgment of conviction for second degree assault, as defined in Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-711(l)(a) (1993), of Karen Ito, his wife (Wife), that although Defendant’s counsel withdrew a lesser-included-offense instruction for third degree assault before the case was presented to the jury, the court was nevertheless required to personally engage Defendant in an on-the-record colloquy to determine whether Defendant understood the consequences of foregoing such an instruction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. EstradaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. KupauHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. KinnaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. OrtizHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. KIKUTAHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. MattsonHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. MattsonHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API