Legal Opinion
Hyland Hill North Condominium Ass'n v. Hyland Hill Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 3, 1995No. Nos. C7-94-2564, C8-94-2573PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
A condominium association sued a condominium developer/declarant (and several associated defendants) for damages based on breach of warranties, breach of fiduciary duties, breach of contract, and negligence, claiming, among other things, construction and design defects. After a jury verdict for the association, the trial court held that a two-year statute of limitations' barred the claims against all defendants for defective construction and design. We reverse as to construction and design defects, but affirm the judgment in other respects.
FACTS
Appellant Hyland Hill North…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Winter v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Griebel v. Andersen Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hyland Hill North Condominium Ass'n v. Hyland Hill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. M.A. Mortenson CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- HYLAND HILL NO. CONDO ASS'N v. HylandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995