Legal Opinion

Winter v. Skoglund

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1987No. C5-86-637, C7-86-848PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT, Justice.

Max Winter, his three daughters, and PJ Acquisition Corporation brought a declaratory judgment action to establish the invalidity of a March 21, 1984, instrument, which purported to subject Winter’s Class B voting stock of Vikings II, Inc., to a right of first refusal. The defendants, Vikings II, Inc., and the other holders of legal or beneficial interests in Vikings II, Inc., Class B voting stock, counterclaimed. They sought specific enforcement of the rights of first refusal purportedly provided in both the March 21, 1984, instrument and in a December, 1977, instrument.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Beihua Sheng, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. PJ Acquisition Corp. v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Webb Publishing Co. v. FosshageCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. City of Savage v. FormanekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API